Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 03:06

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
What’s next?
——K-Pop Songs that got boring really quickly
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Halo: Edge of Dawn | Cover Reveal | Halo - Official Site (en) - Halo Waypoint
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
The Best Tech Gifts for Father’s Day 2025 - Gizmodo
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
The Best Father's Day Gift Ideas for Every Type of Dad - IGN
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Thank you.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
What is your biggest mistake or regret?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Have you ever been humiliated in front of a group of girls and enjoyed it?